Nothing yet but this should be sign for future concern.
From Michael
Connelly - Retired attorney, Constitutional
Law Instructor,
Carrollton
, Texas
Well,
I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House
Bill
3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I
studied it with
particular emphasis from my area of
expertise, constitutional law. I was
frankly concerned that parts
of the proposed law that were being discussed
might be
unconstitutional. What I found was far worse than what I had heard
or
expected.
To begin with, much of what has been said about the
law and its implications
is in fact true, despite what the Democrats
and the media are saying. The
law does provide for rationing of health
care, particularly
where senior citizens and other classes of
citizens are involved, free
health care for illegal immigrants, free
abortion services, and probably
forced participation in abortions by
members of the medical profession..
The Bill will also
eventually force private insurance companies out of
business
and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions
about
personal health care will ultimately be made by federal
bureaucrats and most
of them will not be health care
professionals. Hospital admissions, payments
to physicians, and
allocations of necessary medical devices will be
strictly
controlled.
However, as scary as all of
that it, it just scratches the surface. In fact,
I have concluded that
this legislation really has no intention of providing
affordable health
care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the
most massive
transfer of power to the Executive Branch of
government that
has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If
this law or a similar one
is adopted, major portions of the
Constitution of the
United
States
will effectively have been destroyed.
The first thing to go
will be the masterfully crafted balance of power
between the Executive,
Legislative, and Judicial branches of the
U.S.
Government.
The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration
authority
in a number of different areas over the lives of the American
people
and the businesses they own. The irony is that the Congress
doesn't
have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin
with. I defy
anyone to read the text of
the U.S.
Constitution and find any authority
granted to the members of
Congress to regulate health
care.
This
legislation also provides for access by the appointees of the
Obama
administration
of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal
financial
information, and the information of your employer, physician,
and
hospital. All of this is a direct violation of the specific
provisions of
the 4th Amendment to
the Constitution protecting against
unreasonable searches and
seizures. You can also forget about the right to
privacy. That will
have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the
3rd and 4th
Amendments may provide.
If
you decide not to have healthcare insurance or if you have
private
insurance that is not deemed "acceptable" to the "Health
Choices
Administrator" appointed by Obama there will be a tax imposed
on you.. It is
called a "tax" instead of a fine because of the intent
to avoid application
of the due process clause of the 5th
Amendment.
However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in
the law that
allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax,
it is definitely
depriving someone of property without the "due process
of law.
So,
there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so
much
out the original ten in the Bill of Rights that are
effectively nullified by
this law. It doesn't stop there though.
The 9th Amendment that
provides: "The enumeration in the
Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be construed to deny or
disparage others retained by the people;" The
10th Amendment states:
"The powers not delegated to the United
States
by
the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved
to the
States respectively, or to the people." Under the provisions of
this piece
of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states
are going to
have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once
were theirs to
control.
I could write many more
pages about this legislation, but I think you get
the
idea. This
is not about health care; it is about seizing power
and
limiting
rights. Article
6 of the Constitution requires the members of both
houses of
Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation" to support
the
Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not
be able to vote for
this legislation or anything like it without
feeling I was violating that
sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for
it anyway I would hope the
American people would hold me
accountable.
For
those who might doubt the nature of this threat I suggest they
consult
the source. Here is a link to the Constitution:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html
And
another to the Bill of Rights:
http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html
There
you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from
us.
Michael Connelly
Retired
attorney,
Constitutional Law
Instructor
Carrollton
, Texas
Paul Landers
Freshpoint South Texas
512.276.0681
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. Sign up now.