Loading

Bikers Rights, Motorcycle Rights, Motorcyclists Rights

Bookmark and Share
It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.
NDAA 2013: Drones, Permanent War And Indefinite Detention Without Charge Or Trial For American Citizens On American Soil.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they
 are free. - Goethe
Bruce on Bikers Rights/Motorcyclists Rights
By IronBoltBruce
RSS feed for this page
RSS
STATE HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN RELEVANCE RANKINGS FFY07
Are YOUR state highway safety planners paying enough attention to
Motorcycle Awareness and Motorcycle Safety?

January 2007

HOVER TO SHOW STATE RANKINGS. CLICK STATE TO ZOOM IN. RIGHT CLICK TO ZOOM OUT.
FREE STATE LID STATE


CR State MA MS
1Rhode Island23
2New York16
3South Dakota52
4New Hampshire57
5Maryland39
6California611
7Ohio712
8Montana416
9Louisiana417
10Tennessee913
11Wisconsin915
12Kentucky922
13Vermont829
14Colorado181
15Utah182
16Oregon148
17New Mexico1011
18Connecticut159
19Oklahoma1511
20Illinois184
20Minnesota1113
21North Dakota185
21Texas1514
22Massachusetts1715
23Michigan1717
23Missouri1019
24South Carolina1319
25Georgia1718
26Washington1225
27Nevada1227
28Indiana1129
28Nebraska1228
29Pennsylvania1626
30Kansas1528
31North Carolina1810
32Florida1812
33Arizona1816
34Wyoming1820
35New Jersey1821
36West Virginia1823
37Maine1824
38Iowa1826
39Hawaii1828
40Arkansas1830
41Mississippi1831
42Delaware1233
43Idaho1832
44Alabama1833
44Alaska1833
44Virginia1833

IronBoltBruce on Bikers Rights, Motorcyclists Rights, MRO Are your state highway safety planners spending their time and your tax dollars addressing your issues? Are they paying enough attention to what's needed for Motorcycle Awareness and Motorcycle Safety?

One way to answer these questions is to analyze each of the 50 state's current highway safety and performance plans for content relevant to motorcycle safety and awareness issues--including inattentive, distracted and cell phone conversation impaired drivers--and rank each state's relevance scores against those of the remaining 49.

That's exactly what I did, and the results are summarized in the clickable map above and the table at right. Here is the supporting research:


Background and Data Source

According to the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA):

"In order to receive federal highway safety grant funds, State Highway Safety Offices (SHSO) must submit an annual Highway Safety Performance Plan (HSPP). Every state has a different process for preparing the annual plan and the content of those plans. While similar in many respects, the plans also differ from state to state."

Source:
http://www.ghsa.org/
html/projects/index.html

And according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA):

"Every State is required to submit two plans: a Performance Plan and a Highway Safety Plan. Many States submit the two required plans as one single document."

"The Performance Plan must set measurable highway safety goals for the State.... The Performance Plan must also include [a] description of all highway safety processes for:

  • Identifying problems
  • Setting goals
  • Setting performance measures
  • Selecting projects or activities
  • Involving constituency groups in the planning process
  • A list of data sources and information used in its development."

"In addition, every State must submit a Highway Safety Plan (HSP) that describes specific highway safety programs and projects and relates how performance goals can be reached through these programs and projects. The HSP functions as a State strategic safety plan or road map and describes how the State will reach its goals.... The HSP must, at a minimum:

  • Include one year's worth of Section 402-funded projects
  • Include a list of projects by program area (occupant protection, impaired driving, etc.)
  • Indicate which organization or agency will receive funding
  • Identify the funding amount
  • Ensure that at least 40 percent of the 402 funding either goes directly to local governments or benefits local governments
  • Be approved by the Governor's Representative."

Source:
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outreach/TipsandTactics/
pages/3What_do_SHSOs_Do.htm

NHTSA further explains:

"In the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), Congress directed that NHTSA make publicly available, on its web site, State highway safety plans, State annual accomplishment reports and NHTSA's management review and special management review guidelines."

Source:
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/SAFETEAweb/

As so required, most of the state highway safety plans for FFY07 (Federal Fiscal Year 2007, which began October 1, 2006) have been posted to the NHTSA website here:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/SAFETEAweb/
pages/SafetyPlans.htm


Motorcycling Endurance Riders
Bikers Rights, Motorcyclists Rights, Long Distance Motorcycle Riding

Relevance Ranking Methodology

One way to gauge what issues highway safety planners are focusing on (and how much attention they are paying to them) is to identify key phrases associated with those issues, and determine how many times those phrases appear in their plan documents. These statistics can then be used to compute contextual relevance scores (relative rank weights descending from 50 to 0) that in turn serve as the basis for relevance rankings (relative ranks ascending from 1 to n). The logic behind the approach is similar to that applied by search engine ranking algorithms. And while the results are rarely perfect, the popularity of search engines like Google and Yahoo are a testament to their overall effectiveness and utility.

The key phrases I used to gauge relevance to Motorcycle Awareness included "motorcycle awareness", "inattent", "distract", "cellular" and "cell phone". The rationale for the first key phrase is obvious. The second identifies all references to "inattentional blindness", driver "inattention", and "inattentive" drivers. The third picks up driver "distraction" and "distracted" drivers, the fourth "cellular" phones and calls, and the fifth drivers impaired by "cell phones" and "cell phone" bans.


Note: This methodology did not identify phrases analogous to "motorcycle awareness", e.g. the use of "public awareness" in a motorcycle context. Some may view this as a flaw, while others might see it as an encouragement for state highway planners to use more specific and appropriate terminology. (Either way, any appeals for a revised ranking should be accompanied by a check payable to "Cash" with a few zeroes at the end of the amount, as all research to date has been provided at no cost to the taxpayers and funded solely by yours truly! ;-)


The key phrases I used to gauge relevance to Motorcycle Safety included "motorcycle safety", "motorcyc", and any mentions of the name or abbreviation for that state's leading motorcyclists rights organization (SMRO), e.g. "ABATE of South Dakota" or the "Rhode Island Motorcycle Association". The rationale for the first key phrase is obvious. The second identifies all references to "motorcycle", "motorcycles", "motorcycling", "motorcyclist" or "motorcyclists". The third test credits those state highway planners who explicitly acknowledge their SMRO, or engage them in their planning processes as NHTSA recommends:

"States are encouraged, but not required, to involve constituency groups in the planning process. Constituency groups can be local governments, other State agencies, nonprofit organizations, community programs, State or local chapters of national organizations, or even members of the public at large."

Source:
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/people/outreach/TipsandTactics/
pages/3What_do_SHSOs_Do.htm

Using these criteria and key phrases, I conducted relevance ranking analysis on each of the most recent state highway safety plans on file here with NHTSA (or obtained directly from state websites) as of 14 December 2006:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/SAFETEAweb/
pages/SafetyPlans.htm

For all but a few states, these were the plans for Federal Fiscal Year 2007 (FFY07). I was unable to apply our methodology to the safety plans of three states: Alabama, Alaska and Virginia. The reason is that the PDF documents filed for these three states do not contain searchable text. They are actually "images" of the state plan documents, rather than the documents themselves. This is an undesirable filing practice by these states for a number of reasons, and hopefully ranking last in our analysis will encourage them to file their reports properly in the future.


Relevance Ranking Results and Recommendations

Applying the methodology just described, we were able to compute the Motorcycle Awareness ("MA"), Motorcycle Safety ("MS") and Combined Relevance ("CR") rankings presented in the clickable map above and the table below it. A worksheet summarizing the raw data, relevance scoring and ranking is also available here:

http://www.ldrlongdistancerider.com/SHSPRR-FFY07-PRO.xls

And what should you do with all this? I recommend the following:

  1. Check out the relevance rankings for your state, and then take the time to READ THE ACTUAL PLAN it is based on. Once again, you can retrieve the PDF document here:

    http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/nhtsa/whatsup/SAFETEAweb/
    pages/SafetyPlans.htm

  2. If you disagree with what you read, LET YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANNERS KNOW ABOUT IT.

  3. If you agree with what you read, LET YOUR STATE LEGISLATORS AND HIGHWAY SAFETY PLANNERS KNOW ABOUT IT.

Remember, this is still the good ole USA! We are a democracy. The government is there to serve YOU. The politicians work for YOU. The bureaucrats work for YOU.

Let them know what matters to YOU. Let them know YOU are watching.

Until Next Time ... Ride Long, Ride Free!

top of page    home page

LdrLongDistanceRider.com is a bikers' rights, motorcyclists' issues and long distance motorcycle riding resource for touring endurance riders and extreme cruising on bikes by Aprilia, BMW, Buell, Ducati, H-D/HD/Harley-Davidson, Honda, Kawasaki, Moto-Guzzi, Norton, Suzuki, Triumph, Vengeance, Victory, Yamaha and other makes.

Bookmark and Share
Democrats and Republicans are puppets of the same corporate fascist masters.
GUN CONTROL? If the Corporate Fascist Police State of Amerika wants my gun, they can COME AND TAKE IT!
Stop Complying. Start Defying!

WE HAVE NO RIGHTS SAVE THOSE WE DEFEND.
WE HAVE BUT EACH OTHER ON WHICH TO DEPEND.

IronBoltBruce and VVV PR need your financial support now to continue using veracity with tenacity to expose, resist and reverse the tide of corporate fascist greed and political corruption that is stripping our people of their rights and our planet of its resources. If you want your children and grandchildren to live as free citizens in a sustainable world tomorrow, please give whatever you can to make that possible today:

Freedom is not Free. Please donate.

Share this Responsive Web Design, Miami!

Means|Motive|Opportunity :: Cheney|Peak Oil|9-11!
Products Orders Privacy Legal Resources Copyright © 2005-2014 IronBoltBruce «» Not Compliant: HTML5 · CSS3 · XSLT · Map Web Design Miami Mobile Web Developer