WHILE ROME BURNS ... BETSY FIDDLES
Want to save more lives and money? Lock up dirty doctors ... not lidless riders!
FIGHTING THE WRONG BATTLE
In the entire year of 2005, across the entire United States, mandating that motorcycle riders wear helmets
might have saved 728 lives, but mandating that doctors wash their hands between patients would
have saved at least 90,000 lives.
7 January 2007
Representative Betsy Hands
Montana House of Representatives
PO Box 200400
Helena, MT 59620-0400
Proposed Mandatory Helmet Legislation LC1683
Honorable Representative Hands:
In 2005, approximately 2 million Americans contracted
infections in hospitals,
and at least 90,000 of them died
needlessly as a result.[1,2,3] That same year, 87,000 Americans were injured and another 4,553 were killed
in motorcycle crashes. Of those killed, 2,521 (55%) were wearing helmets AND DIED ANYWAY. Of those injured,
approximately 41,760 (48%) were wearing helmets AND INJURED ANYWAY.
In other words, Ms. Hands, in the entire United States for the entire year of 2005, the maximum number of motorcycle
crash injuries where wearing a helmet MIGHT have made a difference is approximately 45,240, and the maximum number
of motorcycle fatalities where wearing a helmet MIGHT have made a difference is 2,032. And let me clarify what
I mean by "MIGHT". I am aware of no statistics that prove wearing a helmet would have made a difference in ANY
of these cases, or in those cases where it did make a difference, how significant that difference was.
Given this premise, therefore, the following statement is logically irrefutable:
Neither helmets nor mandatory helmet laws can prevent CRASHES, which are the cause of virtually all motorcycle-related
injuries and deaths. And for the entire United States, for the entire year of 2005, wearing a helmet (a) MIGHT
have prevented or reduced no more than 45,240 injuries, and (b) MIGHT have prevented no more than 2,032 deaths.
In fact, NHTSA estimates that in 2005 only
"... 728 more [lives] could have been saved if all motorcyclists had worn helmets."
This is not to suggest that saving 728 lives nationwide is not important. Rather I suggest to you, Ms. Hands,
that for the same investment of time, money, political capital and legislative resources, many more lives could be
saved if you charge in a different direction:
In 2005, needless hospital infections afflicted 44 times as many Americans as were injured in lidless motorcycle crashes,
and there were 124 times as many needless hospital infection deaths as there were lidless motorcycle fatalities.
Those unnecessary infections added $30 billion to our national healthcare tab, while helmetless riders
involved in accidents MIGHT have contributed no more than $1.7 billion.[1,6]
Given that you could save at least 17 times as much money and 124 times as many lives by attacking needless hospital infections
rather than responsible lidless riders, Ms. Hands, what has skewed your focus? Could it be the misleadingly
alarmist statement broadcast by the World Health Organization's "Helmet Initiative" that in Montana, motorcycle
deaths in 2005 approached a 20-year high? If so, then allow me to offer a more realistic statement of the facts:
According to NHTSA, in 2005 there were only 28 motorcycle fatalities in Montana, and chances are that 46.4% of those
riders were wearing helmets AND DIED ANYWAY.
So really, Ms. Hands, just how much impact do you expect your proposed helmet legislation to have? The Great State
of Montana will lose untold millions of dollars in motorcycle- and tourism-related revenues, income, employment and
sales taxes, and gain what?
RATHER THAN PROPOSE NEEDLESS LEGISLATION THAT DISCRIMINATORILY LIMITS FREEDOM OF CHOICE FOR THE FEW, WHY DON'T YOU
INTRODUCE A BILL THAT BOLSTERS RIGHT TO LIFE FOR THE MANY?
"Research indicates that doctors clean their hands before treating a patient only 48% of the time, and this rate
is significantly worse at some hospitals." And as a consequence of their inexcusable negligence, 1 in 20
hospital patients gets an infection--two million Americans every year--and over 90,000 of them die.
(And many of these same care-less physicians call riding a motorcycle without a helmet "irresponsible"!)
How many more innocent Americans must die literally at the hands of their dirty doctors? And how many more
hard-working, tax-paying motorcyclists must die as a result of the negligence and inattentional blindness
of cagers distracted and
impaired by cell phones,
while misguided politicians punish murder victims for not
wearing Kevlar vests? When will this hypocrisy END?
Want to save more lives and money, Ms. Hands? Lock up dirty doctors ... not lidless riders! It will be a simple
thing to do. The Committee to Reduce Infection Deaths has already drafted a model bill for you, and here it is:
YES, MS. HANDS, BUT LID LAWS NO!
I gratefully acknowledge Edward Birch of Tucson, Arizona for inspiring this statement of position, and
attest that I speak strictly for myself and no other individuals or organizations.
Author and Publisher, LdrLongDistanceRider.com
Co-Moderator, Bruce-n-Ray's Biker Forum
Premier Member, Iron Butt Association
Sustaining Member, Motorcycle Riders Foundation
Member and Elite Legislative Supporter, American Motorcyclist Association
Until Next Time ... Ride Long, Ride Free!
top of page
LdrLongDistanceRider.com is a bikers' rights, motorcyclists' issues and long distance motorcycle riding resource for
touring endurance riders and extreme cruising on bikes by
Aprilia, BMW, Buell, Ducati, H-D/HD/Harley-Davidson, Honda, Kawasaki, Moto-Guzzi, Norton, Suzuki,
Triumph, Vengeance, Victory, Yamaha and other makes.